Liquidity
November 3, 2025
- Article last updated on November 4, 2025 -
The U.S. banking system is showing early signs of liquidity stress as bank reserves fall and short-term borrowing costs rise above the Fed’s interest on reserves. These dynamics have now led to confirmation that the Federal Reserve will officially end its Quantitative Tightening (QT) program on December 1, 2025, according to its latest FOMC statement.
While the immediate goal is to stabilize liquidity, the transition away from QT and the potential for renewed balance-sheet expansion also raise questions about the Fed’s independence and the long-term inflation risks of reintroducing excess liquidity into the system.
Audio Article
In recent weeks, concerns about liquidity conditions in the U.S. banking system have grown more pronounced. Analysts and market participants are paying particular attention to regional banks, which appear to be facing tighter funding environments. These developments are closely tied to the Federal Reserve’s ongoing process of balance-sheet reduction, commonly referred to as quantitative tightening (QT).
The Motivation Behind the Fed’s Balance Sheet Reduction
The Federal Reserve began quantitative tightening as part of its broader strategy to combat persistently high inflation and normalize monetary policy after years of extraordinary stimulus. During the pandemic, the Fed’s large-scale asset purchases, known as quantitative easing (QE), expanded its balance sheet to nearly $9 trillion, providing abundant liquidity that supported markets and the economic recovery. However, as inflation surged to multi-decade highs in 2022, maintaining such liquidity levels risked keeping financial conditions overly loose.
Quantitative tightening, therefore, serves as a complement to interest rate hikes, withdrawing excess reserves from the banking system and reducing the Fed’s footprint in bond markets. The goal is to tighten financial conditions gradually, temper credit growth, and bring inflation closer to the Fed’s long-term 2% target without destabilizing the banking sector.
Understanding Quantitative Tightening
Since mid-2022, the Federal Reserve has been engaged in quantitative tightening (QT), a deliberate effort to shrink its balance sheet after years of large-scale asset purchases. The Fed holds a vast portfolio of U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) accumulated through QE. Under QT, it allows these securities to mature without reinvestment, a process known as passive runoff.
To maintain predictability, the Fed set monthly runoff caps of $60 billion for Treasuries and $35 billion for MBS. This steady reduction has lowered total assets from about $9 trillion in early 2022 to roughly $6.5 trillion, a contraction of around $2.5 trillion.
Because a central bank’s assets and liabilities must balance, asset reduction also shrinks liabilities. For the Fed, these include bank reserves, reverse repurchase agreements, and currency in circulation. Of these, bank reserves are most crucial, as they form the backbone of liquidity in the financial system. As QT has progressed, reserves have fallen from around $4 trillion to $3 trillion, tightening available liquidity.
Ultimately, QT drains cash from the system just as QE once supplied it. The pace of this withdrawal determines how smoothly markets adjust: too slow and inflation risks linger, too fast and funding pressures emerge as reserves become scarce.
Historical Context: Lessons from Previous Quantitative Tightening Cycles
The current QT cycle, launched in June 2022, is the largest in the Federal Reserve’s history. Through passive runoff of U.S. Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), the Fed has allowed assets to mature without reinvestment, capped at $60 billion and $35 billion per month, respectively. Since then, its balance sheet has shrunk by about $2.4 trillion, from nearly $9 trillion to $6.6 trillion. Starting from an unprecedented scale, this cycle has been closely managed to avoid market stress, and with reserves nearing the “ample” threshold, officials are signaling that QT may soon end.
The previous QT round, conducted between 2017 and 2019, was smaller and slower. Monthly runoff caps peaked at $30 billion for Treasuries and $20 billion for MBS, trimming the balance sheet by roughly $700 billion before ending abruptly amid a repo market liquidity squeeze. That episode forced the Fed to inject funds and reverse course with renewed asset purchases.
Before the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed had never implemented QT. Policy tightening relied solely on interest rate increases, with the balance sheet remaining stable. The introduction of quantitative easing (QE) after 2008 transformed that framework, making QT a permanent, though delicate, tool in the Fed’s policy arsenal.
Are Bank Reserves Still Adequate?
At first glance, $3 trillion in reserves may seem more than sufficient. However, liquidity is a relative concept; it depends as much on demand as on supply. Banks require reserves to meet payments, regulatory obligations, and daily operational needs. When the demand for reserves exceeds the available supply, the financial system begins to feel liquidity pressure.
To gauge these pressures, markets look to indicators such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR), which reflects the cost of borrowing reserves overnight. This rate can be compared with the interest on reserves (IOR) that the Fed pays banks for holding their balances. Under normal, abundant-liquidity conditions, SOFR tends to stay slightly below the IOR. When liquidity becomes scarce, SOFR rises above the IOR, signaling tighter conditions and higher demand for reserves.
Recent data show that SOFR has indeed moved above the Fed’s IOR, reaching one of the widest spreads observed since QT began. While this does not yet point to a systemic banking crisis, it does represent an early warning sign of liquidity stress within the U.S. financial system.
The Fed’s Response: Ending QT and Restoring Liquidity
The Federal Reserve has now confirmed what markets had long expected: Quantitative Tightening (QT) will end on December 1, 2025. The decision brings to a close the largest balance-sheet reduction in the Fed’s history and comes amid growing signs of liquidity pressure in the U.S. banking system.
Ending QT will stop the further decline in bank reserves and help stabilize short-term funding markets, where borrowing rates such as the SOFR have recently climbed above the Fed’s interest in reserves (IOR). If liquidity conditions continue to tighten, the Fed could still consider targeted balance-sheet expansion—effectively a limited form of quantitative easing (QE)—to support market functioning and ensure orderly conditions.
While the main objective of these measures is to restore liquidity, they also have broader implications. Renewed asset purchases would inject cash into the system and could indirectly lower government borrowing costs, reigniting debate over the boundaries between monetary and fiscal policy.
Fiscal Implications and the Question of Central Bank Independence
This overlap between monetary and fiscal policy raises important long-term concerns. If the Fed begins purchasing Treasury securities mainly to ease the government’s financing burden, it risks blurring the line between independent monetary policy and fiscal support. Over time, this dynamic could encourage political leaders to rely on central bank interventions rather than taking difficult steps to reduce deficits or spending.
The backdrop makes this risk more tangible: U.S. federal interest expenses have more than doubled since before the pandemic, driven by both higher debt levels and rising interest rates. With large fiscal deficits persisting, the temptation to lower borrowing costs through indirect monetary accommodation is real, though controversial.
4 Key Takeaways: The Broader Implications of Quantitative Tightening’s End
- Liquidity pressures are emerging: SOFR has risen above IOR, showing that the demand for reserves is outpacing supply.
- QT is ending: The Fed has confirmed QT will conclude on December 1, 2025, halting further reserve drainage.
- Renewed QE remains possible: If liquidity strains worsen, the Fed could expand its balance sheet again, indirectly easing fiscal pressure.
- Risks to independence: Using monetary policy for fiscal ends could erode the Fed’s credibility, heighten political influence, and eventually fuel inflation.
The Road Ahead for U.S. Liquidity and Fed Policy
The U.S. banking system continues to show signs of tightening liquidity, even as the Federal Reserve prepares to end its quantitative tightening program formally. While this decision may calm short-term funding markets and reduce volatility, it also underscores a deeper challenge: maintaining monetary independence in an environment where fiscal needs and market stability increasingly intersect.
The Fed’s next steps post-QT will determine whether this transition restores balance or opens a new phase of policy complexity for markets, inflation, and central bank credibility.
Stay Ahead in Liquidity and Risk Management
As the Federal Reserve recalibrates its balance sheet strategy, staying informed is key to anticipating liquidity shifts and regulatory implications.
Discover how leading institutions are managing liquidity risk, balance sheet resilience, and evolving reporting requirements.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive expert insights on ALM strategies, liquidity metrics, and U.S. regulatory updates, delivered straight to your inbox.
